User talk:Siren-Com

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

<mise en sommeil (rajouter {{)> User:MiszaBot/config |archive = User talk:Siren-Com/Archive %(counter)d |algo = old(31d) |counter = 7 |maxarchivesize = 14K |archiveheader = <!>{Talkarchive}</!> |minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadstoarchive = 1 <mise en sommeil (rajouter }})>

Bienvenue!

Bonjour, Siren-Com, et bienvenue sur Wikimedia Commons. Merci pour vos contributions. J'espère ue vous allez vous plaire ici et que vous déciderez d'y rester. Voici quelques liens utiles aux nouveaux utilisateurs:

• Premiers pas
• le guide de la Tour de Babel : Commons est un projet vraiment international; voici comment nous nous accommodons des problèmes liés au multilinguisme.
• la Foire aux Questions : les réponses aux questions qui risquent le plus de vous préoccuper
• l'Accueil de la communauté - contient de nombreux autres liens

J'espère que vous apprécierez d'éditer ici et d'être un Wikipédien! Si vous ne l'avez pas déjà fait, vous pourriez vouloir vous faire un compte utilisateur sur le Wikipédia de votre langue préférée, ou sur l'un des autres projets. Incidemment, n'oubliez pas de signer vos commentaires sur les pages de discussions à l'aide de quatre tildes (~~~~), ce qui donnera automatiquement votre pseudonyme et la date, ou de trois tildes pour votre nom seul. Si vous avez avez des questions, laissez un commentaire sur le puit du village, ou posez-les moi sur ma page de discussion. Et encore bienvenue !

Avec toutes mes excuses pour ce chaleureux accueil ! ~ bayo or talk 10:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

• Message historique

Je te souhaite la bienvenue sur le Wikipédia francophone ! A☮ineko ✍ 28 jun 2004 à 17:08 (CEST)

(Poussé hors de Wikipédia francophone le 31 mars 2023, parti sans regret d'un projet en cours de wokisation)

Je vous écoute...

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louis XVI 2 sols 1791 A avers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Union et Force 5 francs an 8 A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeton Louis XV états d'Artois 1722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Technical quality is good. --Plozessor 07:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1972 Piso GF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (I understand that you took the picture, and the 'public domain' template refers to the artwork on the coin, not the picture.) --Plozessor 08:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louis XV 1722 jeton Etats de Bretagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charles X médaille de la Charte 1824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Invalides mnt La Médaille Militaire.jpg

File:Invalides mnt La Médaille Militaire.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Invalides mnt La Médaille Militaire.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marcus Aurelius sesterce Cos II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severus Alexander Cos III - 262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Vincenzo Gemito

Hello. You photographed the Vincenzo Gemito exhibition. Please tell me, did you photograph the statue of Narcissus? --Воскресенский Петр (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I am sure than if I have seen this statue in the exibit in Paris, I will take the picture and put it on "Commons", so I think this statue was not present at the exibit. Not lukky ! ... (after more research) : I have seen again my rushes of 2019 and I have found a picture of Narcisssus but it is blur (not quite sharp picture) and the description is : Atelier Romain, Statuette of Dionysus-Narcissus, Ist century after JC. Naples, museum of national archeology. (62 cm) and not a work of Gemito. I have the book "Gemito" from Paris-Museum. This statue is reproduced, and one of "Fonderie Chiurrazzi" cire perdue copie 61 cm, and the statue by Gemito : 69 cm, 1886, (exposed at the Exposition Universelle d'Anvers, 1885) museum real Bosco di Capodimonte. In this catalogue : This two statues were exposed in Paris (number 105 and 106) ! and I don't take picture !!! It is un bilievable !! Why I don't take this tow pictures ?. If you want to see the blur picture, I can download it on Commons. - Siren-Com (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! France Directoire - 2 décimes l'an 4 A (1795).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry, but the coins aren't cut out correctly. At some places they have brown edges and at other places (like at the top of the left coin) parts are missing and blended with the white background. --Plozessor 05:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC) Ok I see, I will make another, the problem is about uni directionel lightning and little no sticte orthogonal position. - Siren-Com 16:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC) Ok, done, you can see another version of this image... - Siren-Com 14:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Warning

Hi again. I wrote to you in a section archived to User talk:Siren-Com/Archive 6#Reminder 14:26, 29 August 2022 (UTC) about making a malformed deletion request. In this edit, you made another one: not including reason, year, month, or day; not creating the subpage; not notifying; and not transcluding. Such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests." I have redirected the category instead, as it stood for almost five years with the unaccented spelling and had three members at the time of your unorthodox rename (see COM:RAC for the proper procedure), and adjusted Wikidata.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 04:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Marche contre l' antisémitisme Paris 12-10-2023 - 17.jpg

File:Marche contre l' antisémitisme Paris 12-10-2023 - 17.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marche contre l' antisémitisme Paris 12-10-20… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 01:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg

File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo by Harcourt Studio published in 1960, it is definitively not in the French public domain (70 years after publication for collective works). We can undelete in 2056 when it enters the public domain in the US. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Günther Frager (talk) 12:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg

File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 12:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Denoyelle

Bonjour,

Il y a quelques années, dans une discussion, tu avais mentionné que tu avais le livre de Françoise Denoyelle de 1992 sur Harcourt. Est-ce que tu as encore ce livre ? Tu avais noté que les informations générales ne nous avançaient pas. Mais aurais-tu l'amabilité de vérifier à l'intérieur du texte du livre, s'il y a une section qui relaterait la donation des négatifs au ministère de la Culture en 1989 et la faillite de 1991 du Studio et si par hasard Françoise Denoyelle relaterait où sont allés les droits d'auteur sur les photos à ces moments ? Ou si elle n'en fait mention nulle part dans le livre ? Est-ce que les parties du livre de 1992 sur l'histoire du Studio s'arrêtent avant la faillite de 1991, ou après la faillite mais avant le rachat par un nouveau propriétaire en 1992, ou après le rachat ? Comme tu as pu le constater plus haut, quelqu'un a reparti pour un nouveau tour des discussions au sujet des photos Harcourt sur Commons. Ce serait bien si on pouvait trouver des informations solides à ce sujet. Françoise Denoyelle serait une personne qui pourrait connaître ce genre d'informations et qui en a peut-être parlé dans ce livre ou dans un livre ou un article ultérieur. Je ne sais pas si tu as encore le livre et si tu aurais le temps de fouiller ça un peu, mais merci d'avance en tout cas.

-- Asclepias (talk) 22:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

@Asclepias: , bonjour, je ne retrouve plus ce livre mais je crois qu'il s'agissait d'un petit livre essentiellement de photos (il en a plusieurs dans la série) où ne devait pas se trouver beaucoup d'informations. Il existe un autre livre paru en 2012 avec 254 pages qui serait sans doute plus complet : [1]. Il doit être consultable en bibliothèque. Il me semblait que ce problème des photos Harcourt était basé sur un jugement officiel et ceux qui ont créé la licence spécifique doivent être au courant. Cordialement - Siren-Com (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Ok, merci. En effet, le livre de 2012 serait probablement plus informatif. En ce qui concerne le jugement du tribunal, si c'est ce à quoi tu réfères, ça dit que les droits d'auteur appartiennent initialement au Studio et pas aux photographes individuels. Mais c'est une question différente de celle de savoir si le Studio avait conservé ses droits d'auteur sur les photos ou s'il les a cédés à quelqu'un d'autre ou s'il les a libérés dans le domaine public lors des donations, faillite et rachat des années 1989 à 1992. Les responsables du Studio Harcourt eux-mêmes disent que les droits d'auteur des photos de 1934 à 1991 ont été libérés dans le domaine public et Commons accepte ces photos depuis lors (voir notamment le Bistro là et là). Mais il y a des utilisateurs de Commons qui refusent de croire le Studio Harcourt (voir là, en anglais). Donc, on cherche plus de sources qui pourraient éclairer la question. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Studio Harcourt This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Camille Arambourg Harcourt.jpg

And also:

• File:Charles de Gaulle 1951 Harcourt.jpg
• File:Charles de Gaulle studio Harcourt 1948.jpg
• File:Félix Raugel Harcourt.jpg
• File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:10, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Studio Harcourt This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Camille Arambourg Harcourt.jpg

And also:

• File:Charles de Gaulle 1948 Harcourt.jpg
• File:Charles de Gaulle studio Harcourt 1948.jpg
• File:Erna Dem (1889-1943) studio Harcourt.jpg
• File:Félix Raugel Harcourt.jpg
• File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 27 September 2025, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2023 Picture of the Year contest.

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.

Round 2 will end at 11 October 2025, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now! If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/ESF badges This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:58, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Studio Talbot portrait ovale.jpg

Copyright status: File:Studio Talbot portrait ovale.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Studio Talbot portrait ovale.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

File:L'atelier de la rue Jeanne-d'Arc - Raoul Dufy.jpg

File:L'atelier de la rue Jeanne-d'Arc - Raoul Dufy.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:L'atelier de la rue Jeanne-d'Arc - Raoul Dufy… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 12:33, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria 1891 silver crown.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 22:07, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Shangri-La Hotel Paris This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Shangri-La Hôtel Paris 2011.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 10:42, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, indeed, these buildings, works of 2 architect : Michel Roux-Spitz (1888-1957) and Ernest Janty (1837-1913) will enter the public domain on January 1, 2028, in two years. Sincerely. Siren-Com (talk) 12:48, 28 December 2025 (UTC)